Energy software development
for the decarbonisation decade.
Smart metering, grid platforms, MRV systems, carbon accounting, and the sensor-to-market pipelines keeping the energy transition honest. Built for real-world physics and regulatory scrutiny.
Data quality is climate outcomes.
Energy and climate software stands or falls on measurement. A carbon credit, a grid-balance decision, a smart-meter bill. All rest on the provenance and accuracy of sensor data. Get the data right and the rest of the stack follows.
We've built smart-metering platforms, MRV (measurement, reporting, verification) systems, grid edge analytics, and carbon accounting tools. Every project has end-to-end data lineage and a dashboard regulators can interrogate in real time.
Things we've shipped
in energy.
A sample of what we've built in this sector. We omit client names by default and share them under NDA when you want to dig into a specific engagement.
The problems energy teams bring to us.
Smart metering at national scale.
DCC integration, multi-vendor metering, tariff engines, settlement. The boring bedrock of a modern utility.
Grid edge and DERMS.
Distributed energy resource management for solar, storage, EV, and demand response. Real-time orchestration, not monthly spreadsheets.
MRV and carbon accounting.
Sensor ingestion, calculation engines, audit trails, verifier workflows. Built for nature-based and industrial project developers alike.
Climate intelligence platforms.
Risk models, scenario planning, transition-plan software. For asset owners and the financial institutions funding them.
What we've built for energy, more than once.
Sensor and telemetry pipelines.
Low-bandwidth ingestion, edge aggregation, time-series storage. From LoRaWAN meters to industrial OT networks.
Calculation and verification engines.
Deterministic, auditable, replayable. Emissions, credits, grid balance, whatever the methodology demands.
Operator dashboards.
Real-time ops views and retrospective analytics in the same surface. Built for the 3am incident and the monthly board pack.
Customer-facing energy apps.
Usage, tariff, bill-shock prevention, demand-response enrolment. Where behavioural change actually happens.
Three ways to work with us
in energy.
Pick the shape that matches the commitment. Each model ships the same engineering standard. The difference is commercial and operating fit.
Dedicated teams
A cross-functional pod owning a workstream end-to-end.
Offshore development centre
A fully-managed engineering arm built in-region.
Staff augmentation
Senior engineers plugged straight into your team.
AI in energy & climate.
Turning field notes and inspection reports into structured records, assistants that answer questions over asset and sensor data, and first drafts of regulatory reports.
Explore AI developmentOur journey with them has been nothing short of exemplary, far exceeding our initial expectations.
Answers for energy & climate buyers.
Still wondering something? Ask an engineer
Smart-metering and grid-edge platforms, MRV and carbon-accounting systems, asset and outage management, and the analytics layers on top. Energy data is regulated and long-lived, so lineage matters: we build so that any number on a dashboard can be traced back to the reading that produced it.
Yes. Measurement, reporting, and verification pipelines with end-to-end data lineage and calculation engines that keep their working. Because these numbers get audited, we design the system so that a reviewer can reproduce any figure and see which methodology version generated it.
Yes, with the operational-technology boundary treated seriously. Integration with SCADA, historians, and metering infrastructure runs through clearly defined interfaces with strict access control, so analytics workloads can read what they need without introducing a path into control systems.
We staff Energy & climate engagements with engineers and delivery leads who've shipped in the sector before, backed by patterns proven across 5,000+ projects. The domain literacy is learned on the ground, not looked up.
We work to energy-market codes, MRV protocols, carbon-accounting standards, and DCC integration where relevant. Every engagement starts with a compliance review so there's no ambiguity about which regimes apply. Every release ships with the audit trail your compliance team needs.
Yes. Most of our engagements connect to DERMS, grid platforms, metering back-ends, and carbon registries. We adopt your existing integration patterns rather than imposing a new one, and we write data contracts before we write integration code.
We design for sensor-grade data quality, audit-ready lineage, and multi-decade data retention from day one, not as a post-launch afterthought. Performance budgets, SLO commitments, and ops runbooks are written into the statement of work.
Either. Energy & climate engagements run under all three of our engagement models. Dedicated teams, offshore development centres, or embedded staff augmentation. We pick the shape that matches your operating model, not our preferred one.
Discovery typically runs two to four weeks from first call to signed statement of work. First-engineer start dates follow within another week or two. The exact timeline depends on the shape and on the clearance or onboarding your environment requires.
Let's build from here.
Thirty minutes with an engineer who builds. No sales, no drip campaign. If we're the wrong fit we'll tell you and point you somewhere better.
